June 27, 2012

Crescent Nebula, NGC 6888, Bi-color (June 2012)

Here is a bi-color combine of the Ha[+NII] and OIII data.  I had to tone down the Ha so that the OIII would show up.  The OIII is so dim from my backyard, and my camera so less sensitive to it, that I would have to take a lot more than 5 hours to brighten it up.  There are many great images of this object around the web.  Some of my favorites are Jim Wood and Emanuele Colognato's, here, and Ken Crawford's, here, taken with, respectively, 24" and 20" telescopes, and from darker skies.  The Crescent Nebula is about 5,000 light years away in the constellation Cygnus.

Telescope: Orion 6" f/5 Imaging Newtonian and Astro-Tech Coma Corrector (eff. at f/5.5)
Camera and Exposure: Ha (13x20'), OIII (15x20'), thru the SXVF-H9, Alnitak Flat-man flats
Filter: Astronomik 12nm Ha & OIII
Guiding: SX Lodestar and SX OAG
Mount: Takahashi NJP
Software: Nebulosity, Maxim DL, Registar, Photoshop CS3
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Hat tip to Steve Cannistra for the bi-color processing method.

June 25, 2012

Crescent Nebula, NGC 6888, in OIII (June 24, 2012)


Here is NGC 6888 in a wavelength dominated by glowing, ionized oxygen.  It is much fainter than the Ha, partly because my camera is less sensitive in this part of the spectrum.

Telescope: Orion 6" f/5 Imaging Newtonian and Astro-Tech Coma Corrector (eff. at f/5.5)
Camera and Exposure: 15x20' thru the SXVF-H9, Alnitak Flat-man flats
Filter: Astronomik 12nm OIII
Guiding: SX Lodestar and SX OAG
Mount: Takahashi NJP
Software: Nebulosity, Maxim DL, Photoshop CS3
Location: The Woodlands, TX

June 12, 2012

First Light: C8

OK, this my latest.  I've worked with a few Schmidt-Cassegrain telescopes over the years.  I had a C5+ with very nice optics, and an observing buddy had a great C8.  Otherwise, my experience has been uneven.  But the reputation for these scopes purchased lately has been very good, and I wanted a good all-around observing scope of some size for planets, star parties, and nights when clouds come by around midnight.

I took this new C8 tube for a spin last night and formed a preliminary impression: Fantastic!  If there was image shift, it was entirely buried in the shaking created by my touching the focus knob.  Even slightly out of collimation the scope gave wonderful view of Saturn, complete with rings A, B, and C, and four bright moons.  And a not half-bad view of Mars.  After I collimated it, the star images looked pretty textbook to me at 400x (the planets had moved behind the trees by that point).  Wonderful!  It's a delightful scope, and very smart-looking.  It came Fastar-ready, but for now it will just sit nicely on the EM-10.

Perhaps I can quit buying scopes now.  Just kidding.  I'm joining TA: "Hi, my name is Val, and ...."

Update: I took the C8 out to a scout camp this week.  I gave a speech to about 90 young women who were camped there, and then they all looked at Saturn.  I love the comments they made: "It looks like a picture!"  "It looks so Saturn-y!"  "It looks like a sticker."  "Whoa!"  You know, Saturn is the big show.  The rings looked great, and moons, and the shadow of the rings on the planet.  Most viewed the planet through a 15mm Orion Expanse eyepiece, at 133.3x.  After everyone had looked, I pulled out the Vixen Lanthanum 5mm, and we looked at 400x.  At moments of good seeing, this was a fabulous view, but I did not get to look much, as I wanted everyone else to see.

Then all the girls left, but a few leaders stayed to see a few more things.  I put in the Meade SWA Series 5000 28mm, and we looked at the Ring Nebula, a random galaxy that I found in the Virgo cluster, M13, and M8.  All of them looked great.  Stars were pinpoint across the middle 70% of the view (the 28mm 68-degree eyepiece taxes the standard SCT just a bit, but I'm probably the only one who noticed, and I always put the thing I'm looking at in the center).  With the polar aligned EM-10, everything stays right where I put it.  M13 received votes for favorite object, next to Saturn, of course.

I like the scope a lot.  It sits well on the EM-10, though it's about as much as I would put on that mount.  I did not notice any image shift at all in this scope.  Focusing snapped in at about the rate one would imagine for an f/10 scope, but, when focused, the view was very sharp, on this night limited by seeing and not by the scope.

June 6, 2012

Venus Transit (June 5, 2012)

 

I'm not really a solar system imager, but who can resist an opportunity that happens only twice at 100+-year intervals?  I set up in the back yard and figured I might have an hour and a half through partly cloudy skies.  Actually,  I had about ten minutes of open sky, and I shot about ten single frames.  These are my best.  I planned a number of ways to image this but at the last minute reverted to the method I began with years ago in astro-imaging: eyepiece projection through a ClearVue 30mm eyepiece, a camera adapter, and my now-ancient Sony DSC-75.  This foolproof system allows me to focus visually and then screw the camera onto the adapter.  The camera then autofocuses on the image that the eyepiece puts up. 
After about ten minutes, the clouds moved in.
And then in some more.
And then the view totally clouded over.  Notice there are no shadows in this last image. This is the SV80ED with the WO diagonal, ClearVue eyepiece, and adapter, mounted on the EM-10.  I removed the camera so I could take a picture of the scope.  Of course, others took some wonderful images of the transit (one of my favorites is Rory's: here), and they are all over the web.  I'm happy to have seen it.  It's pretty cool to think of the sun 93 million miles away and Venus about 26 million miles away, and one moving across the other from our line of sight.

June 2, 2012

Crescent Nebula, NGC 6888, in Ha (June 1, 2012)


The moon was 90% full, but one can shoot H-alpha under the moon.  This is the Crescent Nebula, or at least the part made up of excited hydrogen (and perhaps nitrogen).  What you see here is essentially a large front of excited gas created by the movement of a bright, active star (the one at the center of the nebula) through a cloud of hydrogen.  The brighter part looks more like a crescent; the name matches visual observations.

Flats were taken with an Alnitak Flat-Man, which just arrived.  I used one of these two years ago and always thought it the perfect solution.  Last night's use persuades me I was right. This is also the first image I've taken with an H-alpha filter through the Orion 6IN.  And it's the first time I've stretched subs to 20 minutes.  I should have done 30 minutes, I think, and will try to with the OIII, or with more H-alpha, if I try to gather more data on this object.

Telescope: Orion 6" f/5 Imaging Newtonian and Astro-Tech Coma Corrector (eff. at f/5.5)
Camera and Exposure: 13x20' thru the SXVF-H9, Alnitak Flat-man flats
Filter: Astronomik 12nm Ha [+NII]
Guiding: SX Lodestar and SX OAG
Mount: Takahashi NJP
Software: Nebulosity, Maxim DL, Photoshop CS3
Location: The Woodlands, TX